Thursday, March 24, 2005
Smart growth means child-free cities
San Francisco and Seattle have the fewest number of children per capita of all major U.S. cities, but Portland isn't far behind. This lengthy New York Times article (free subscription required) about Portland says the city expects to close three to four elementry schools per year for the next decade because families with children have fled to the suburbs where they can afford homes with yards.
"The very things that attract people who revitalize a city - dense vertical housing, fashionable restaurants and shops and mass transit that makes a car unnecessary - are driving out children by making the neighborhoods too expensive for young families," says the article. "The real estate is becoming outrageously expensive," says one resident, so many families have moved to Vancouver, Washington, which has less growth-management planning.
"The very things that attract people who revitalize a city - dense vertical housing, fashionable restaurants and shops and mass transit that makes a car unnecessary - are driving out children by making the neighborhoods too expensive for young families," says the article. "The real estate is becoming outrageously expensive," says one resident, so many families have moved to Vancouver, Washington, which has less growth-management planning.
Federal subsidies to passenger transportation
A new study from the US DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics compares federal subsidies to air, rail, highway, and transit passengers from 1990 to 2002. Transit subsidies have been the largest in most years, averaging about $5 billion a year. Air subsidies have fluctuated -- and were even negative in 1999 and 2000 -- but in other years averaged about $2.5 billion. Rail subsidies (meaning Amtrak) averaged about a billion dollars a year. Highway subsidies averaged negative $7 billion a year, meaning highway users were subsidizing transit riders and other things.
On a per-passenger-mile basis, Amtrak subsidies were the greatest, averaging 20 cents a mile. Transit subsidies averaged more than 10 cents a mile. Air and highway subsidies (or negative subsidies) are close to zero mainly because there is so much more airline and highway travel than Amtrak or transit travel.
These are federal subsidies only. State subsidies to highways also tend to be negative as they divert gas taxes to transit and other uses, but local subsidies to highways out of property and other taxes tend to offset the federal and state diversions. Overall, my calculations indicate that about 10 percent of the cost of highways, roads, and streets are subsidized. This averages about 0.3 cents per passenger mile.
Of course, state and local subsidies to transit make total transit subsidies much larger than indicated in this report. According to the data from the American Public Transit Association, total federal, state, and local subsidies to transit in 2002 were more than 60 cents per passenger mile.
On a per-passenger-mile basis, Amtrak subsidies were the greatest, averaging 20 cents a mile. Transit subsidies averaged more than 10 cents a mile. Air and highway subsidies (or negative subsidies) are close to zero mainly because there is so much more airline and highway travel than Amtrak or transit travel.
These are federal subsidies only. State subsidies to highways also tend to be negative as they divert gas taxes to transit and other uses, but local subsidies to highways out of property and other taxes tend to offset the federal and state diversions. Overall, my calculations indicate that about 10 percent of the cost of highways, roads, and streets are subsidized. This averages about 0.3 cents per passenger mile.
Of course, state and local subsidies to transit make total transit subsidies much larger than indicated in this report. According to the data from the American Public Transit Association, total federal, state, and local subsidies to transit in 2002 were more than 60 cents per passenger mile.